Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:46:43 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] considering packaging another mailx
Message-ID: <20140915104643.25dea7f5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook>
References: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:33:17 -0700
Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> I'm inclined to think that in the short term, heirloom-mailx would be
> a significant improvement over our current main/mailx.

Agree.

> What I'd like to do is add testing/heirloom-mailx providing mailx;
> I have a preliminary aport without the provides part.
> In the future, upgrading to s-nail seems like a logical path; but
> I think that using s-nail now might be hasty.

The upstream tarball is named mailx so i think you can just call it
testing/mailx and we simply purge unmaintained/mailx.

Thank you very much for following this up!

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---