X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (3.203.202.84.customer.cdi.no [84.202.203.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66DF7DC00E4; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:46:43 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Isaac Dunham Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] considering packaging another mailx Message-ID: <20140915104643.25dea7f5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook> References: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1-156-gb29a92 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:33:17 -0700 Isaac Dunham wrote: > I'm inclined to think that in the short term, heirloom-mailx would be > a significant improvement over our current main/mailx. Agree. > What I'd like to do is add testing/heirloom-mailx providing mailx; > I have a preliminary aport without the provides part. > In the future, upgrading to s-nail seems like a logical path; but > I think that using s-nail now might be hasty. The upstream tarball is named mailx so i think you can just call it testing/mailx and we simply purge unmaintained/mailx. Thank you very much for following this up! -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---