X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E5DDC00E4 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ey11so6437137pad.34 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QgxPTDJjdqUv1wloRF43vCvOo9hJmqF2gpLxYbd0EEE=; b=AtDNnFQW1N+FxaDIw6TKknahy5N+MfvhHUbIiYf13L4m3lSMtJHkD7Umc6Yut1k75B TzExxHDxjewhcb26JTPNwSwCJkr1GcQS7EhWtEzEtgsRqlzvXctMsaXcg1BugVjXMQUj Mhzrrp4LqxiLaQAeVIMt1//MGeuQN20lT9+2ng0A2x7HhJv+ORcXycmaW1YqtBz0XhUL BiiA7F600Yne2lkdfDOKa301jYf+uPgv4smLZBQEaQoaYhpJflE4WH602IpOtdk4y+6P rNN7K90qxDn/aypgp7aTZ76YjI7O7b74YWbgu3kvgDIqVmNwtE1+kOlMmrTc4RTCvLZJ B7yg== X-Received: by 10.68.202.225 with SMTP id kl1mr24039349pbc.21.1410791852258; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from muslin ([50.0.225.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xu4sm12079954pab.30.2014.09.15.07.37.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:37:29 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham To: Natanael Copa Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] considering packaging another mailx Message-ID: <20140915143728.GA514@muslin> References: <20140913203317.GA5578@newbook> <20140915104643.25dea7f5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140915104643.25dea7f5@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:46:43AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:33:17 -0700 > Isaac Dunham wrote: > > > I'm inclined to think that in the short term, heirloom-mailx would be > > a significant improvement over our current main/mailx. > > Agree. > > > What I'd like to do is add testing/heirloom-mailx providing mailx; > > I have a preliminary aport without the provides part. > > In the future, upgrading to s-nail seems like a logical path; but > > I think that using s-nail now might be hasty. > > The upstream tarball is named mailx so i think you can just call it > testing/mailx and we simply purge unmaintained/mailx. > > Thank you very much for following this up! I think you're getting packages a little mixed up due to all the occurences of mailx. There are two preexisting packages: unmaintained/mailx-support main/mailx mailx-support is the "lockspool" utility from OpenBSD, which should probably be used whenever mbox-format spools are used. If it were renamed to lockspool, that would be more informative. main/mailx is in main, so I don't want to purge it just yet. But it would be more accurate to rename it to main/mail Now, a note: If heirloom-mailx gets renamed to mailx, it will need one alteration: I'm using the package name to rename mailx.1 so it doesn't conflict with man-pages. In my experiene, the magic that the fts APKBUILD uses to try to avoid intalling fts-doc along with man-pages doesn't work, so I'd rather not duplicate it. Thanks, Isaac Dunham --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---