X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1517DC0096 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id pn19so4384016lab.14 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 00:21:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ln1IS7YOoA6tDfWpET7oym12nixFAPJtxsxtAown74Y=; b=m03PCkL+GpmXac/rvc512mIBKKrD6El9MH1XwpRseI6Sbdcbn2dey1yQsUjJebYwhh uZJkjt/qFn0pqH/sJCuFqshhkYdDkmIfrPwIphLRYSH+a7Q6KdnBfUKIlBdCCQ+2fNp5 EhqMQj0HxQqMx7sG5dzmtH7stC8yJ/m+6nzCJbxeMv3rNXhzDD2vRrh7+wwmnOPSSiX3 OOt9r7oifN3ptDwLb0aWnGxSIELjDLkeAuVs5y4bj+x5HqxX3aLXsUL5p4NriQa2L3je BpD2/5sXKYoW+O+ttTGGWodhXql4PdcI2KbO0H2jruBlTnv639uEvCMLj6YYJ66TUb5L lP6g== X-Received: by 10.112.11.133 with SMTP id q5mr15164023lbb.77.1414308074950; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 00:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vostro (mail.fi.jw.org. [83.145.235.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm2911957laa.37.2014.10.26.00.21.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 00:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Timo_Ter=C3=A4s?= Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:20:34 +0200 From: Timo Teras To: systmkor Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] LibreSSL - Thoughts on Integration Message-ID: <20141026092034.4491cfcc@vostro> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:02:39 -0700 systmkor wrote: > Is there any plans on making LibreSSL a package, alternative install > to OpenSSL, or becoming the default instead of OpenSSL? What do you > guys think and why? We discussed this when libressl was published, and decided to wait at least a little bit because the initial versions had some bugs, and the portable version was not available. There was also discussion on picking up some other proven crypto library with better license, and just write openssl api layer for it. But this is a lot bigger job and has not progressed since. I think we'll reconsider starting using libressl after next stable branching of Alpine (which is due in few weeks). /Timo --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---