X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (unknown [79.160.13.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A704DC030C; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 07:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:52:53 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Isaac Dunham Cc: Timo Teras , alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Could we break the mesa-dev dependency on mesa-dbg? Message-ID: <20141113085253.2d65f3c1@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20141111172609.GA1814@newbook> References: <20141110182421.GA3402@newbook> <20141111104850.5699d6b3@vostro> <20141111121532.338a51a7@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> <20141111172609.GA1814@newbook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:26:10 -0800 Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:15:32PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:48:50 +0200 > > Timo Teras wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:24:22 -0800 > > > Isaac Dunham wrote: > > > > > > > I have several development packages installed, which drag in three > > > > -dbg packages: glib-dbg, musl-dbg, and mesa-dbg. > > > > In theory, I can see the logic for -dev requiring -dbg. > > > > In practice, I've installed the Qt5 development packages to build > > > > the Otter browser, whiich works quite well; these pull in mesa-dev, > > > > thus pulling in mesa-dbg, which is over 100 megabytes I have > > > > absolutely no use for (~7% of total disk usage). > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to make mesa-dbg an exception, due to its > > > > extremely large installed size? > > > > > > I think it would be useful if none of the -dev packages depended on the > > > -dbg. It's not a dependency. And it'll made builders run faster, etc. > > > > > > I think -dbg should be standalone. It's needed only when debugging a > > > package. > > > > > > > I agree, but unfortunally, we just built world with current behaviour and I just did RC1. > > > > I can update abuild to not add -dbg as subpackage but then all the > > packages which has -dbg needs to be rebuilt. > > > Are we ok to do this before RC2? > > I'm inclined to suggest doing it after 3.1, given where we are. Good. I removed the mesa-dbg subpackage for now to address your specific issue. Thanks! -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---