Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:56:45 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: systmkor <systmkor@gmail.com>
Cc: Alpine-devel <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] blog post - 'long term support considered
 harmful'
Message-ID: <20150203165645.16a24551@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com>
References: <EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:23:24 -0800
systmkor <systmkor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thou=
ght.
>=20
> http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful =
<http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful>
>=20
> *
> keybase.io/systmkor

That is interesting indeed. I think it would be very convenient to only
support 2 stable branches. I am not sure how that would work in
practice though.

I would like to split the aports tree and provide longer time support
(2 years) for only a small set of packages rather than try support it
all.

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---