X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from ncopa-laptop (189-70-255-191.user.veloxzone.com.br [189.70.255.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC58BDC0092; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:00:58 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Timo Teras Cc: Alpine-devel Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] openssl-1.0.2 or libressl ? Message-ID: <20150206150058.7e3d2e9b@ncopa-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20150203192523.247fbf53@vostro> References: <20150203192523.247fbf53@vostro> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:25:23 +0200 Timo Teras wrote: > Hi, > > openssl-1.0.2 is out. Upgrading to it will probably mean > recompiling most of the packages. > > So I'm wondering should we reconsider libressl at this point? Any > thoughts? I don't want Alpine to jump on every new hype that appears in media. libressl is still young so I think it would be wait a bit more to see if it is something that will stay. I think it would be nice to have libressl in testing though so we have something to compare with. Thanks. -nc > > Thanks, > Timo > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---