X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (unknown [79.160.13.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB4C0DC680E; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:14:19 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Olivier Mauras Cc: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Fw: [alpine-aports] [Patch] mkinitfs - Support for root_type and root_options Message-ID: <20150316161419.44a5f4a2@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <418ebc36905fc436a830d3d91870d204@core-hosting.net> References: <20150316113651.52ba616b@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> <418ebc36905fc436a830d3d91870d204@core-hosting.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:20:00 +0200 Olivier Mauras wrote: > > > On 2015-03-16 12:36, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > I am forwarding a > patch for mkinitfs from alpine-aports mailing list > > for discussion. > > > > > I agree that we want support mounting p9 as root file system from > > > initramfs. > > > > I would like to avoid to introduce 2 new boot options: > root_type and > > root_options. > > > > Questions: > > > > Can we implement this > without introducing new boot options? > > > > If not, how does other > distros handle this? Do they have other boot > > options for it? > > > > Are > we happy with introducing root_type and root_options as boot > > > options? > > > > I am open for ideas. ... > FWIW, RHEL7 implements it > in dracut with "root=virtfs:9p_name" ok, this is an option we should consider. > I just felt that having the options > could be more useful - beyond 9p but i agree, is it needed ? - than > hardcoding 9p support :) we have root_size for tmpfs root which would correspond to root_options="-s ..." I agree it would be nice to avoid hardcoding every supported root type. anyone know what debian, ubuntu, arch and gentoo does for 9p as root? If the majority use root=virtfs:9p_name then we should maybe follow that. > > Olivier > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---