X-Original-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DDBDC0687 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.tetrasec.net (unknown [74.117.189.116]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D71DC024A for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (unknown [79.160.13.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by newmail.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B5B95A83EA; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:43:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:53:52 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Isaac Dunham Cc: "V.Krishn" , alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] v3.3 feature freeze Message-ID: <20151027085352.39153888@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20151027021046.GA6443@newbook> References: <20151022180104.1feeb73a@ncopa-laptop> <201510230304.36654.vkrishn4@gmail.com> <20151026101227.2e9e3058@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> <20151027021046.GA6443@newbook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:10:47 -0700 Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:27AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 03:04:36 +0530 > > "V.Krishn" wrote: > > > Based on 2 above, I can spot (debatable though), > > > zabbix, nagios, wayland > > > > I think we want atleast zabbix and nagios to stay in main. > > > > Wayland can probably move to community, unless there is something that > > depends on it that we want/need keep in main. > > > > Would be great if the feedback would not include any kind of research > > from my part (eg wayland is in the dependency chain of what packages?) > > If you build mesa with wayland support enabled (as we do), mesa and Xorg > depend on wayland. (IMHO, this feels wrong, but that's how upstream did > it...) yes. I think we want start from the other end, take toplevel deps (packages that nothing depends on) and work downwards. We could for example move mate-*? We could also move xfce, but I don't think xfce causes much maintenance work. It is a slow moving project. > HTH, > Isaac Dunham -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---