X-Original-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8ADC013B for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E0FDC00BA for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so34254740pac.3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Xxtzn6pwIXMnMtFNDo9mfoLgVZdXukDJSqxbh91GxmY=; b=BGWLZL9EA635fJFA6fN6ox4fNSDJRT5DhfqVSJBqOaMvb4QpA8+4Aj1mbftff+yvPu ZaIRtkJVuDQdTM9Ezm8razpHArbnqRp/sYfoF9BQ/q7m0UySelFRaq1p1zcskcoJYiZ9 A9elK0YXRsPfg6kYny1qLRDrvvIrKC0aw8UXhamz1MelsfmIuAOKKP/IsLix3z846ilK P5pK2dmBnFmfKc19VXOx6hgssDoFzuBorm4svq4gStVcorxCE8jvYriGabE/ivJv/+Fh xH0d5IBLtE9oAbjHpj9yI4Fz65jGuXtTNTYfZ+bIdyxz8bIQu2OuMxA09lCCsa8L6FcT K1MQ== X-Received: by 10.66.63.8 with SMTP id c8mr352374pas.41.1446104468263; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from microknoppix.localnet ([117.223.210.73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ea5sm482870pbc.92.2015.10.29.00.41.06 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:41:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "V.Krishn" Reply-To: vkrishn4@gmail.com To: Leonardo Arena Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] v3.3 feature freeze Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:11:01 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.9.6-64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <20151022180104.1feeb73a@ncopa-laptop> <20151026101227.2e9e3058@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> <1445872834.3455.43.camel@df1844j> In-Reply-To: <1445872834.3455.43.camel@df1844j> Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201510291311.01965.vkrishn4@gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP > On lun, 2015-10-26 at 10:12 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 03:04:36 +0530 > > > > "V.Krishn" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We now need to stop working on new features for the v3.3 release and > > > > concentrate on wrapping things up for v3.3 release. Testing and > > > > fixing bugs. > > > > > > > > A few questions: > > > > > > > > Can we make the 'lua' package be lua5.3? I think everything that > > > > needs 5.1 should have depends on 'lua5.1' instead of 'lua'. > > > > > > > > Can anyone help with upgrading llvm-3.7 and clang? > > > > > > > > Can anyone help with upgrade xen to 4.6? > > > > > > > > I'd like to move as much ruby stuff as possible to community, can > > > > someone help with that? > > > > > > > > Are there anything else that needs cleanup for v3.3? > > > > > > Any thoughts on: > > > 1. All desktops except one that we want to keep as default and ready to > > > jump on it to fix when update available or broken. > > > > You mean move to community? > > > > I'm all for moving as much as possible to community. > > > > The question was more general, what more cleanup, more than just move > > stuff to community, are *needed* before v3.3. Eg the critical stuff, > > the things we can not forget. > > > > > 2. Web application like drupal, phpmyadmin, owncloud i.e pkgs that does > > > not require compiling and are sometimes more easier to install by > > > downloading the orig tar and just uncompressing in web-folders. > > > > What about those packages? > > I think we should move to community the packages which don't have stable > and maintained releases. This is not the case of ownCloud since is > maintained for 1,5 years after release. For example v6.0.0 was released > in Dec. 2013 and last update was 6.0.9 on July 2016. v7.0.0 was released > July 2014 it's still actively maintained. > > I think it's handy to have web applications packages for run-from-RAM > installations. Also upgrade of packaged web application is faster then > tar-based installations. > > Not sure about drupal maintenance policy, and may be phpmyadmin can be > likely moved. Criteria is not upstream stability release but, 1. Does these pkgs' normal updates get backported ? 2. If we decide fitting main is one CD or two do we want them in main then ? 3. Pkgs like these are easy to maintain and maybe tagged/delegated to new or less experienced maintainers. 4. Note, there is no stopping for main devs in maintaining community pkgs. > > > > More pkgs can be picked based on definition and difference > > > > > > in community and main (please expand) > > > > > > 1. main requires 2yrs maintenance skill commitment. > > > 2. main has higher priority when comes to pushing update/broken pkgs in > > > next releases , right ? > > > > Something like that yes. > > > > > Based on 2 above, I can spot (debatable though), > > > > > > zabbix, nagios, wayland > > > > I think we want atleast zabbix and nagios to stay in main. > > +1 > > > Wayland can probably move to community, unless there is something that > > depends on it that we want/need keep in main. > > > > Would be great if the feedback would not include any kind of research > > from my part (eg wayland is in the dependency chain of what packages?) > > > > > This can also help in creating various isos, like > > > 1. alpine-boot (bootable+live+AL preferred net tools/utils) > > > > > > media that gets you started with bare alpine install > > > (quite same as current alpine-mini) > > > > > > 2. alpine-cd (same above + main) - non-desktop > > > 2a. alpine-cd2 (anything in main if above 700mb) > > > ... > > > 3. alpine-dvd (1+2+2a+community) > > > > Lets take that discussion after v3.3. We are unfortunally running out > > of time for v3.3 release. > > > > > What if 2+3 had boot options - grsec vanilla ? > > > Will this help in not creating the smaller sized vanilla and xen isos ? > > > > to late for this kind of changes now. > > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > -nc > > I'll try to come up with list of packages that we could consider moving > to community. > > Thanks! > > - leo --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---