X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mailauth4.nine.ch (mailauth4.nine.ch [94.230.211.190]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5525C4418 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:19:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailauth4.nine.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDA6C009E; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:19:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailauth4.nine.ch X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=disabled Received: from mailauth4.nine.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailauth4.nine.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YgJx5uPJaTTG; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:19:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from vimes (174.180.4.85.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch [85.4.180.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pf@1042.ch) by mailauth4.nine.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:19:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by vimes (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA9BD200F9; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:19:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:19:51 +0100 From: Jean-Louis Fuchs To: William Pitcock Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Calling build() check() package() might be a bad order Message-ID: <20170308131951.GB16013@angua.1042.ch> References: <20170304153449.GA24485@angua.1042.ch> <20170305050829.GA28810@riseup.net> X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H1spWtNR+x+ondvy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi William On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:34:27AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > I would simply not bother running the testsuite at all, > because you're not testing the actual binaries going into the package, > making the testsuite ineffective (from a distribution point of view). I think I got it, I will change my build system the following way: make check Not instrumented (release mode), goal: checking compatibility=20 make test Instrumented (dev mode), goal: helping developers to find bugs Of course most of tests are shared between both test-suites, but some may not make sense in either test-suite. Best, Jean-Louis --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYwAT1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ3RTBFQTE3OUE3QUY0QTdFNTU1REIzRDU0 Mzk1OUY2ODQwODg2RDQ1AAoJEEOVn2hAiG1FYnoP/Rd3ktaTQi2xhRSPI7mL+n5l BsEKYI86DbmZQu4/HAldtdZsp01n2AMbxF03mTVVjqMlxmlHIzzcBYo/8fdfVWib hqzowlevLXN/KyZePFosgjRjoh4DQauvA0d4GdcIE2coglHiHzb0ZDAJZOCQtdVi LmLm5ewG5rm7BBd0/CiS9ndY7B/ijhSF/qYMGdYYf/0BcLx9ZE1x3Ln+16t8WdWZ 7+w/6SZ0dj3XZuvhm+VdEpUqFgNqmVTFUX9NxBwx2GS6k7FXnzWrrMpCTv6Fed8W WkFX74KbgmCJX668XkFRHF/y7CJ/72TKzJ/tDow64xxy9DPnj9E3IU1EMIPwBnTT eJFmp/d+BZ8Tqzi37kj6Y2IFyd6uaH9vTL+bSgXigH052iUZ71Mi1mdr8Q3xmPNv C7WMmbcugyf5zCy4xyDK+bWLUAmP0BUtKa18c+5vbcn2g/xkYRlds9TsACS2/Oid jAiqu4PKcJ/P0A8CScORw1VrCtq6I/dcIMam5/LCXDeJ2FiVnKc+oHuyeqocyj3q WFW3RZwbQy2/Mdd5PTEco0Q6PpXWpqZy0plj4+0ghOT6kjW8raG5VINFjSSMd0CG mXV0CkfnvwpLl0ZNd3CTCZ23lcBNYIfu2Xpx0X2+aQJjyxuaIiBlLpxODJBdflB+ 6adLitC72ZMjAV0WJghx =yyxr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy-- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---