X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25])
	by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256B75C402D
	for <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:52:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA579E2486;
	Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:52:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org)
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 441DD9E03B1;
	Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:52:30 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:52:25 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: "Tmp File" <tmpfile@mail.com>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Maintainership is mandatory in main
Message-ID: <20170714185225.6fdbce23@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-01a0a2ce-8151-449a-98bb-ba57040cc393-1499861721677@3capp-mailcom-lxa12>
References: <trinity-01a0a2ce-8151-449a-98bb-ba57040cc393-1499861721677@3capp-mailcom-lxa12>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel
Precedence: list
List-Id: Alpine Development <alpine-devel.lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+subscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:15:21 +0200
"Tmp File" <tmpfile@mail.com> wrote:

> Hello Alpinists.
> 
> I found one commit by Francesco Colista today in which he took maintainership of sfic because it is mandatory in main for all packages to have maintainers and sfic didn't.
> So I went to investigate if that was really the case for all other packages in main and I found 41 packages without maintainers.
> I thought I would let you know.

Thanks!

If nobody wants take responsability for some of those, then I think we
should just assign the committer who moved it to main as maintainer.

-nc

> 
> main/coova-chilli
> main/freeswitch-sounds-pt-br-karina-8000
> main/grub
> main/gtk-engines
> main/libatomic_ops
> main/libcddb
> main/libdvbcsa
> main/libechonest
> main/libgnomekbd
> main/liblastfm
> main/liblogging
> main/libresample
> main/libvncserver
> main/libxshmfence
> main/libzdb
> main/linenoise
> main/menu-cache
> main/mtr
> main/perl-canary-stability
> main/perl-crypt-ssleay
> main/perl-extutils-cchecker
> main/perl-ipc-sharelite
> main/perl-module-implementation
> main/perl-stream-buffered
> main/perl-test-requiresinternet
> main/perl-xml-sax-base
> main/perl-xml-sax
> main/py-musicbrainzngs
> main/py-pylast
> main/qca
> main/qjson
> main/quazip
> main/recode
> main/scstadmin
> main/tcl-tls
> main/tinyxml
> main/ttf-droid
> main/twm
> main/ufsutils
> main/uvncrepeater
> main/websocket++
> 
> HTH
> tmpfile
> 
> 
> ---
> Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
> 



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---