X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6035C5715 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:57:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094979E3064; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:57:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0D3F9E251E; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:57:27 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:57:23 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Jean-Louis Fuchs Cc: William Pitcock , alpine-dev Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [DRAFT] Alpine Linux Code of Conduct Message-ID: <20171006155723.11dcf6c3@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <20171006110305.GA5952@angua.1042.ch> References: <20171006110305.GA5952@angua.1042.ch> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:03:05 +0200 Jean-Louis Fuchs wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:14:00AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > > I like it for it is short, yet clear. +1 I would like to have it shorter, but I doubt we can shorten it more without being less clear? This list is partially mentioned twice: > ... regardless of experience, gender identity and expression, sexual > orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race, > ethnicity, age, religion, nationality or any other protected > categories under applicable law. Later under "Explicitly Disallowed Conduct": > > 1. Discrimination based on, but not limited to, gender, gender identity, race, > > nationality, sexuality, religion, age, physical disability, mental > > disability, init system preference, body type or size is not > > allowed. Maybe we could combine that somehow to avoid duplication? > init system preference, feels to me like an metaphor for technological > preferences. So I would write "technological preferences for example > init systems" or just "technological preferences". But I also have to > say that "init systems" alone was totally clear to me, at least if it > meant technological preferences. "Technological preferences" should also cover "programming language preference". I support this change. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---