X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DF65C572A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:41:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13F39E3057; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:41:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE10A9E251E; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:41:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:41:31 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: William Pitcock Cc: alpine-dev Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [DRAFT] Alpine Linux Code of Conduct Message-ID: <20171006164131.5ad38db1@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 03:14:00 -0500 William Pitcock wrote: > Hello, > > As I have mentioned before, I have been working on a proposed Code of > Conduct, in the spirit of previous proposals. I took a closer look at previous proposals and one thing I am missing compared to previous proposal is "respectful". ... > 2. Be civil and tolerant towards others. Maybe we could add "respectful" here? -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---