X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EAC5C4E0E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:01:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06C9E1F02; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:01:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE0029E0358; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:01:17 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:01:12 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Jack Schmidt Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Hardened kernels 4.9.65-r0 are actually 4.9.59 Message-ID: <20171128180112.7d24ec0f@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <7E9EEE36-99DE-48CD-9FDB-20F801F91E32@mowsey.org> References: <7E9EEE36-99DE-48CD-9FDB-20F801F91E32@mowsey.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:08:26 -0500 Jack Schmidt wrote: > I noticed the recently released (virt)hardened kernels (4.9.65) > appear to have been patched back to 4.9.59. > > The hardened-3.1-4.9.65-201704252333-alpine.patch appears to mostly > revert the source back 4.9.59 (I spot checked 5 or 6 changes in > 4.9.64--4.9.65, and all were reverted). Yes I messed up when preparing the patch, and thought my test script was broken when testbooted it before pushing. It should be fixed with 4.9.65-r1 Thanks! -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---