X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D635C336F for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543149E254B; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-macbook.copa.dup.pw (unknown [187.60.66.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B369E1CE9; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 19:18:12 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Kevin Chadwick Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Proposed change: openssl 1.1 as default system openssl implementation Message-ID: <20180209191812.75311aa7@ncopa-macbook.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <20180208180544.3ff19e66@mechanicum.chadwicks.me.uk> References: <20180208180544.3ff19e66@mechanicum.chadwicks.me.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:05:44 +0000 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > If there is no objection to this proposed change, I intend to do the > > swap next week. > > No objection, just not impressed. Alpine could make a stand but what > difference would it make. I would love to make a stand. What do you suggest we do? Drop support for 32 bit linux til they have solved the 32 bit time_t issue in the kernel? "Sorry but you can forget running alpine on your RPI/old x86, but don't worry, you still have LibreSSL!" -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---