X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D1B5C61C8 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 20:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5909E28FA; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 20:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E45CF9E0462; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 20:54:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:54:21 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Chris Ely Cc: Alpine Development Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] How to improve quality control for patch reviews Message-ID: <20180726225421.3be824d6@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <67E3C4D9-0183-45E7-8381-662CD7F54C4B@icloud.com> References: <20180726141558.2d451763@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> <67E3C4D9-0183-45E7-8381-662CD7F54C4B@icloud.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:27:31 -0400 Chris Ely wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > Any other ideas or thoughts? > > I'd like to see more use of collaborators feature of GitHub for > aports specifically. I sent my ideas for this in an earlier email. I missed this. Sorry. > With a bit of automation we can turn GitHub into a sort of staging > area where people can take a more active role before being given push > access. As of right now, there's very little contributors can do with > PRs as they aren't part of the alpinelinux organization. This sounds very interesting. I will followed your other email. > I personally find having stale labels / reviews and no feedback very > frustrating. So I'm very much in favor of expanding the pool of > people who can provide feedback and adjust labels / review statuses. Yes, this is something I want fix. I think that we could probably start with a few bots that creates labels based on :+1: votes. It would be very helpful to be able to sort PRs on number of upvotes. I'd also like to a bot that can set a tag on issues that has responded to feedback. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---