X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com (mail-lf1-f68.google.com [209.85.167.68]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F85C649D for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id t140-v6so5591527lff.4 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzoDYkeP1sXGpQCF6LD4mKf/+kyuHVGvYmksC9qyIJQ=; b=nOwP6laIrF5pke2/BjW34G0RbQNtpmo0UNbpyc4NAzP3QEDymhO/j+RGODM4n2ZJaS 7jaHA9DqX60OegmDknTKaaG5j1zh+5kt58Maslgg9wsBCpbRhuvI0GYUNpb0GYt/G7n5 M2z/sXkWaUbrnRqYigJEIr4e2qOFLrBBzv3pcuHsJyqZaPWOl9laIXj1kGKmFRq6tf8U xud35eo7Zyi3rRkmiT8quDDGLe4cfu1+M/eHKysxPK0OdG0kPKu/Z/Jkx0pg2roCAqmS +FIGFXTPM5mqV5xjuSKvfV4BfO2rPXFNI1PaYN1xpdw0GoMzt+PtcQJSO7htRKQ97Slu PRug== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AM3WYxdZmnyzsQb2yYDXrdWebXCQNAh456mNKygz2kKqUtHHwH rQs4zfVRIoOgFL4PNB959mg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY9m418D9ancgvZXw4xV6A2+nN3KzXAWYjQJUD8vtgm4HTSndiSqfni59qN5Da1dCnl1DuB7g== X-Received: by 2002:a19:7510:: with SMTP id y16-v6mr2582480lfe.100.1537372238353; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vostro (37-219-41-237.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.219.41.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u63-v6sm1138309lff.24.2018.09.19.08.50.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:50:33 +0300 From: Timo Teras To: Timo =?UTF-8?B?VGVyw6Rz?= Cc: Natanael Copa , Oliver Smith , alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine and armv7 Message-ID: <20180919185033.3a981b15@vostro> In-Reply-To: References: <144d0e30-3c17-66b9-b2b6-7671eb8b6f84@bitmessage.ch> <20180919154656.7c6dfb9b@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:43:02 +0300 Timo Ter=C3=A4s wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, 16.47 Natanael Copa, > wrote: >=20 > > > @ncopa What do you think? =20 > > > > I am in favor of this too. Do we need add armv7 while keeping armhf > > as armv6? Or can we simply replace the current armhf build with > > armv7? Then the triplet would correspond better with debian, if i > > understand things correctly. > > =20 >=20 > Let's keep armhf still for a while. I suggest we bootstrap armv7 on > x86-64 and start new builder edge/armv7. Once all builds, we can poll > how many still need armhf. >=20 > And yes armv7 is more common now than armhf. Raspbian originally was > armhf equivalent. Rpi1 was the only major benefiter. >=20 > I can bootstrap armv7 packages. And put them somewhere. >=20 > Meanwhile, we probably want to patch aports to change all arch places > from armhf to armhf+armv7, or potentially add "arm" as umbrella for > all the 32bit arm builds and change armhf to that. Maybe someone can > do that while I prepare the initial package set cross built. Initial bootstrap build completed. Packages are at: http://dev.alpinelinux.org/~tteras/armv7/ Let's start a new edge builder using those. Timo --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---