X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.cmpwn.com (mail.cmpwn.com [45.56.77.53]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F8AF83199; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:39:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1553100092; bh=lE08vq5mmuebO2Lm7DKQPg0WA1bzFgIr+c1hmTTu4hk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EN23/NegKA2M+SM5regERBbPcf1e5o03MOSD95vwQc0+VNOKTyUiQ6vJsfDjZ4ilO YCz4FPw5BKhiBs5q0u+Aq9UTCSHkZ+8KEMBpIFsgJi47erZRVW7pDEk7J5B+RSI5CX BghSinEHfgldUktJky4ERyK5PmlWOw4Yg//AIu3s= Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:39:23 -0400 From: Drew DeVault To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Cc: alpine-infra@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: [alpine-devel] Re: Improving Alpine Linux's email stack Message-ID: <20190320163923.GA10676@homura.localdomain> References: <20190320040551.GA2283@homura.localdomain> X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190320040551.GA2283@homura.localdomain> X-GNU: Terry Pratchett On 2019-03-20 12:05 AM, Drew DeVault wrote: > The main issues with mlmmj are: > > - It strips out In-Reply-To headers when forwarding mail, which breaks > threading Correction: it does not do this. Broken threading on my mirror must be caused by something else. However, this is true: > - It modifies emails a lot in general, which breaks DKIM signatures and > will trip a lot of spam filters up And I also forgot to mention that mlmmj doesn't really pay attention to RFCs and trips up on, for example, email addresses which include / or ~, which are valid email addresses. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---