Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:05:12 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Chloe Kudryavtsev <toast@toastin.space>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Planning for 3.10 release
Message-ID: <20190403190512.071c0423@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <66704640-2373-401e-f81a-fa7f9c0a4828@toastin.space>
References: <20190403172825.5e8384b3@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
	<66704640-2373-401e-f81a-fa7f9c0a4828@toastin.space>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:58:37 -0400
Chloe Kudryavtsev <toast@toastin.space> wrote:

> On 4/3/2019 11:28 AM, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Things that I would like to have included in 3.10:
> > - at least one more architecture for rust.  
> 
> +1
> 
> > - update the other languages that uses llvm and try get rid of old llvm.  
> 
> +1
> 
> > Are there anything else we should try squeeze in?  
> 
> I would really like to squeeze in GCC 9 (with D support, which has 
> landed in it).
> However, 9.1 is releasing "imminently" (expected mid-April, about 12 P1 
> bugs left).

I don't think we should wait for that. It may be delayed, and gcc
upgrades has traditionally caused build failures for various packages
so lots of work will be needed to troubleshoot and report bugs upstream.

We may want upgrade to gcc 9 soon after 3.10 release though.

-nc

> In the case that we don't think we can squeeze it into 3.10, I'd like to 
> put it on record here (so we remember it for 3.11).
> 
> 
> ---
> Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
> 



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---