X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CBAF816AC for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6849E1CFD; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A9199E0081; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:42:29 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: "Francesco Colista" Cc: "Alpine Development" Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Planning for 3.10 release Message-ID: <20190403204229.7e38d83e@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: References: <20190403172825.5e8384b3@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:32:42 +0000 "Francesco Colista" wrote: > > Are there anything else we should try squeeze in? > > Any plan to promote wireguard from testing to community? that is a good question. Let us bring that up again once the 3.10 builders are up and running. > > Are there any other ABI breaking upgrades that requires lots of > > rebuilds? We should try prioritize those too. > > qt5 from 5.12.1 to 5.12.2. that will not break ABI, but would be nice to have updated before 3.10 release. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---