Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:47:46 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: "Milan P. =?ISO-8859-1?B?U3Rhbmkq?=" <mps@arvanta.net>
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Planning for 3.10 release
Message-ID: <20190403204746.79e22779@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <20190403180821.GA16228@arya.arvanta.net>
References: <20190403172825.5e8384b3@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
	<20190403180821.GA16228@arya.arvanta.net>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:08:21 +0200
Milan P. Stani* <mps@arvanta.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 17:28, Natanael Copa wrote:
> [...]
> > - at least one more architecture for rust. =20
>=20
> Current state with llvm deters me to try to make clean and canonical
> APKBUILD and patches for aarch64 and armv7 (maybe ppc64)  and I wait
> till this (llvm status) will be solved.

What is the issue with llvm? Is it tracked some where? is there a PR
for it?
=20
> To note, I have rust apk's for Alpine aarch64 and armv7 but they are not
> canonical Alpine packages but I build with them some application like
> firefox and some smaller, although didn't managed to build everything I
> tried but didn't tried hard enough, probably.

That is great news. Then there is hope to have both aarch64 and armv7
support at least.
=20
> If anyone have experience with building rust on aarch64 and armv7
> please reply to this mail here (or in private, however you like) and
> I'm ready to share all my work on it, give it to someone more
> experienced, team work or whatever.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---