X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793E9F8318C for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275139E1FE9; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 499649E0048; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:27:23 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: Chloe Kudryavtsev Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Rework the base team description Message-ID: <20190411152723.32e38e16@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <9ab6d193-4671-1786-1214-65daad959aed@toastin.space> References: <20190409050210.20217-1-sir@cmpwn.com> <20190409050210.20217-3-sir@cmpwn.com> <20190409133140.GB21799@homura.localdomain> <6B5C3246-C8D8-4CE8-8A56-8ECBADE4654B@yahoo.com> <20190409175838.GE21799@homura.localdomain> <20190410203624.35719561@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> <9ab6d193-4671-1786-1214-65daad959aed@toastin.space> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:52:58 -0400 Chloe Kudryavtsev wrote: > On 4/10/2019 2:36 PM, Natanael Copa wrote: > > I will unlike sit and do nothing for a year so why would I want to get > > back to the Alpine drama instead of continue with the new thing I'm > > doing? > > You only have to take a break from being on base. > Membership (or even adminship) of multiple teams is allowed. > So you're not "leaving the project for a year", you just take a break > from being "the ultimate authority" for a year. There is no guarantee that anyone gets re-elected. So after being forced to step down I could have the choice to continue do bug fixing, provide user support etc, but I would no longer have any responsibility of how the projects goes, nor need to deal with people drama and CoC violations, nor need to care about technical decisions. That would be someone elses problem. > In short, everyone except you (and maybe Carlo) are currently in that > position, and I don't think saying that everyone except you "sit around > and do nothing" is fair. Ofcourse not. What I meant was that this would be a great opportunity for me to start some new exciting project. If i did that. Why would I be interested in getting back into "base" and clean up whatever mess the last person has introduced? > As such, surely you'll agree, that concern is a bit moot - after all, we > don't expect people that haven't and aren't doing anything with the > project to be elected into base, are we? The concern here is, do we want rotate out good people? Or do we want try keep them. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---