Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:46:30 +0300
From: Consus <consus@ftml.net>
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Stripping down the governance model proposal
Message-ID: <20190419074630.GA2636@eddy.kbs.local>
References: <20190415152330.GG1179@homura.localdomain>
 <c5146728-ebc1-f90b-4333-6871c4402c6d@toastin.space>
 <0fdde07c-b505-fb2a-cff2-bba494c781e3@lohutok.net>
 <0712b237-864e-5304-f4e3-695d0a5207c6@toastin.space>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0712b237-864e-5304-f4e3-695d0a5207c6@toastin.space>

On 21:15 Thu 18 Apr, Chloe Kudryavtsev wrote:
> On 4/18/2019 6:07 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> > There is a third possibility that's worse than those two: a proposal
> > that fixes a large number of issues passes, but is generally not
> > accepted by the community because they aren't comfortable with it. It
> > becomes official, but no one respects or abides by it, and you
> > effectively end up with no governance model at all, and a lot of
> > confusion and disruption to the project.
> 
> That seems to be at least tangentially related to what happened to the
> previous interim policy - it never ended up being followed.

I don't have a say on this topic, but there is a possibility that no one
followed it because there is no real need in at this moment.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---