Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25])	by
 nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6165781B3E	for
 <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B79E2619;
	Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:54:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no
 [37.200.63.67])	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256
 bits)	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 server-digest SHA256)	(No client certificate requested)	(Authenticated
 sender: alpine@tanael.org)	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
 27FD89E259C;	Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:54:23 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Alba Pompeo <albapompeo@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Thomsen <oss@cogitri.dev>, me@cosmoborsky.com,
 ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: APKBUILD Optional/Recommended Dependencies
Message-ID: <20190822105423.649ddc29@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJDAfTDq725MQ_T3LaS015XVwbDtrTZMmLJRjCEd38rUmJGJJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <883dca1a-b7f3-6137-059d-f561ef22c126@cosmoborsky.com>
	<e096850a-8d73-b321-8ac8-24caa4614e3e@cosmoborsky.com>
	<5d5c8583.1c69fb81.9691a.45e5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
	<CAJDAfTDq725MQ_T3LaS015XVwbDtrTZMmLJRjCEd38rUmJGJJA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:05:46 -0300
Alba Pompeo <albapompeo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Optional dependencies in my opinion could cause many problems and
> solve very few problems.

I agree with this. I believe it would create more problems than it
solves. Same with "recommends".

-nc