Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [66.245.176.36])
	by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AD8781AF8
	for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:24:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5AD4B304;
	Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:24:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org)
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EB834B303;
	Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:24:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:19 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: David Demelier <markand@malikania.fr>
Cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Does it make sense to keep ~alpine/aports running?
Message-ID: <20200310132419.746033ee@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <03c0778e-260a-30d8-1144-d0f28ea0d4a5@malikania.fr>
References: <24b91bd507e8151d41ac1d9866a4fd7a07febfe0.camel@cogitri.dev>
	<03c0778e-260a-30d8-1144-d0f28ea0d4a5@malikania.fr>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:14:59 +0100
David Demelier <markand@malikania.fr> wrote:
 
> Also, the mailing list system used does not send a mail back from the 
> original poster, which makes sometimes unconvenient to respond to your 
> own mail to add more information.

There was some discussions about fixing this a month ago (before I went
to vacation).

Drew, what happened with this feature?

-nc