Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [66.245.176.36])
	by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B13DF780002
	for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri,  8 Jan 2021 16:59:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C92A175BE9;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2021 16:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.lan (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org)
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5216D175BE8;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2021 16:59:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:59:44 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: "J Larkin" <jeff@ihapro.com>
Cc: <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Subject: Re: static qemu-arm(-static) and others
Message-ID: <20210108175944.37b3f6fe@ncopa-desktop.lan>
In-Reply-To: <000001d6e5cd$897f5c50$9c7e14f0$@com>
References: <000001d6e5cd$897f5c50$9c7e14f0$@com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 06:49:57 -0800
"J Larkin" <jeff@ihapro.com> wrote:

> Natanael,
> 
> Could you please add the static versions of the qemu-[arch](-static) to the
> builds.

what do you mean "to the builds"?

> These are SOOO useful for cross arch chroot testing. 

yes they are. But I think all the qemu-$arch are static. those are not
useful when dynamically built so we only build those static.

> Use them all the time in Debian, really miss them when testing in Alpine.
> Some kernels do not to need host static binaries in the chroot, but that's
> been a crap shoot in my experience.
> 
> Thank you,
> J Larkin
>