Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:46:11 +0100
From: Wolf <wolf@wolfsden.cz>
To: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
Cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Please reply to this email to re-license your prior Alpine wiki
 contributions
Message-ID: <20220119234611.h2ozbfcc6e7lffu3@mail.wolfsden.cz>
References: <CH58XEZPYFYT.1MV854Y4P2Q2O@taiga>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CH58XEZPYFYT.1MV854Y4P2Q2O@taiga>

Hi,

On 2022-01-14 09:15:26 +0100, Drew DeVault wrote:
> If you consent to having your wiki contributions distributed under the
> terms of CC-BY-SA, please reply to this email with the following
> template:

I, <redacted since wiki states it is optional>, hereby re-license my
contributions to the Alpine Linux wiki under the username Gray wolf
under the terms of the CC-BY-SA license.



Also, one question. Wiki now shows this header:

    Please note as of 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 UTC all new wiki pages are
    licensed as CC-BY-SA-4.0.
    
    See https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Alpine_Linux:Privacy_policy for
    more details.
    
    Existing pages retain the old license.

Is that accurate? Is the licensing done on page-level instead of on
contribution-level? At least from this email I've got different
impression.

W.

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.