DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=tve8bMB9tg6LiWpmZ7gu0YPscpBuoW/5bPUvQ1980J84RYvCROeqJNEWv22+vsKgFDwZLlUxljG6YXH8uEjkpMqwBULw6oZfJ35TYL1rgKWAXaEBhsli3A/SqClkNrWWpwYmAj8A0n8A+gBDLvZrDTw1rVe0FrDjZtLZtNgBDws=;
Message-ID: <217153.98632.qm@web130121.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <AANLkTimF+B+BFgv3W40mr6hOvSC2-i__JzD08qw1YWw-@mail.gmail.com> <ae76329461bdcd0ce9ac9356a3b0aa58@127.0.0.1> <AANLkTimN=XEmgvHyaMuEqiAhEf++A7iuhKagpkyCspDH@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:29:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Trask <ttrask01@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine package browser
To: Carlo Landmeter <clandmeter@gmail.com>, francesco@bsod.eu
Cc: Alpine-devel <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimN=XEmgvHyaMuEqiAhEf++A7iuhKagpkyCspDH@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Ted is not up to this task right now. :) Go with the existing solution that you 
prefer for alpinelinux.org.

Ted



----- Original Message ----
From: Carlo Landmeter <clandmeter@gmail.com>
To: francesco@bsod.eu
Cc: Alpine-devel <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 6:27:47 AM
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine package browser

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Francesco Colista
<francesco.colista@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:49:24 +0100, Carlo Landmeter
> <clandmeter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have been talking on IRC about setting up a package browser for our
>> APK repo's.
>
>> * Python APKINDEX parser
>> * APKINDEX format (possible to get additional information like
>> maintainer/contributor...)
>> * Parser linking to git/buildbot for updates
>> * APK SQL database schema
>> * Drupal as Package browser (or do we prefer ACF)
>> * APK browser features compared Arch/others
>> * Additional features/information like git rss viewer
>
> I agree with all this point.
> I think (IMHO) is better to use the ACF + Lua.
> It's the standard alpine framework, is fast, and Ted will appreciate
> some helps :)

If Ted is up to this task to develop this in ACF + Lua then i would endorse it.
This means all new functions/features will also be developed, do we
want that or should we use existing solutions and focus on development
of Alpine Linux?

>
> My two cents.
> --
> :: Francesco ::
> Jabber: francesco@jabber.org
> E-Mail: francesco@bsod.eu
> GnuPG: FE9DDD5F
>


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---