Received: from magnesium.8pit.net (magnesium.8pit.net [45.76.88.171]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15CC5782BD8 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magnesium.8pit.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by magnesium.8pit.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1f410159 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:59:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=soeren-tempel.net; h=date :to:subject:from:references:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=opensmtpd; bh=HQa9CWT hVSE1jrYEgSYjf+HaOME=; b=f87S+ia5WONTyUWWLCB3I2BbW9NwG+h+LMIo0cn YIUUpTZbG6R1r/rRfVH0saJ+d3hz9Xox0L9AIXyA34nY7XIw4peEsgNNeoRRcED0 4VxADwjnPW81UuJ9iyHi/Vyz9WOBRF7ay/KZByL/cIiwZMvtiH33Mq+TMBBiVF3R bHs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=soeren-tempel.net; h=date:to :subject:from:references:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=opensmtpd; b=H bXamRofanIq9AiNvE/fpWtOmxHY2Ul4N4rvGSZ2tKxHebbhBuK3e2AfwsRvEc6zR Dh6v1BkUeF3y23ItSgvo7+Vx0p9wW0gwRvF+VRBZRCzGqlAwlZNrXbSMsdZRPNJm p9q1L/VGMC7qDqSxgJ8IfwSVQwh//JoBWLBhLNASpk= Received: from localhost (ip4d17229f.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.23.34.159]) by magnesium.8pit.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2792fd87 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:YES) for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:59:46 +0200 To: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: team-maintained packages From: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren?= Tempel References: <1765542.52O7J0OIYB@localhost> <20200608105947.39003711@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> <7a0647b48d615b4f61f776c3e34374f50c61b85e.camel@cogitri.dev> <20200608124653.009172bf@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: <20200608124653.009172bf@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> Message-Id: <29JTA7M9GK125.2RPZSJJSZVXUA@8pit.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like the proposal in general, I am not so sure about team coordinators though. Natanael Copa wrote: > Coordinators role would be to have overview and be a communication > point for the team. A contributor wants to help with something, lets > say documentation, and it is known that there are 2 other people > working on it too. Who should the contributor speak with to avoid > double work? The coordinator. I think team coordination is something that could just be decided internally by the team itself. For instance, an IRC channel or similar would imho also be sufficient for coordination within the team without having a central team coordinator. Cheers, S=C3=B6ren