X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch (mail2.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.22]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D9DF854F7 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 09:44:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=corv.in; s=protonmail; t=1554630265; bh=2U42MIgmnYJOuOZXj1mOZ2sKK7g4CQyB7DxxqGkx4hw=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID: From; b=ftdUhoM9I9a5x4YLlNe14Ym/wLJWDCNa9K+IJs+1LDFsGb63/iuTu7deNm1Gsaehs mul2Vktsw+RR5Gq278MSDSLQ8GsRU4FbUt8kr25eYv7vDNPVIkMdYnzcocC1HUfc8o zgY7DtnMRPWwnk54LWXzmhgN0wUn5v8CObcqIcnY= To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org From: Corvin Wimmer Reply-To: Corvin Wimmer Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Should we drop armhf (armv6) support with 3.10 release? Message-ID: <455BE708-3E46-432D-AC0F-5D7B0FB2ABFD@corv.in> In-Reply-To: References: <20190404112525.4b04fdeb@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> Feedback-ID: ydr38C0ZZGWUttUWFa871AKKWlQSANMVLmfhd471nXQCjfQm9TjinzLtOlEI8-0ed5FWzsO_RzaWtT3crTGedw==:Ext:ProtonMail X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch > On 4. Apr 2019, at 16:25, Natanael Copa wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I wonder if can drop armhf (armv6) support with the 3.10 release, now > that we have armv7? >=20 > In practice it means that we no longer support Raspberry PI 1 and Zero. >=20 > We will still support those with alpine v3.9 for another year. >=20 > I believe dropping armhf (armv6) will save some resources when it comes > to managing build servers, disk space, spending time on fixing armhf > specific problems. >=20 > We may also optimize the vanilla kernel better for armv7, which > currently uses same config as armv6. >=20 > What do you think, can we drop armhf for v3.10 or should we wait til > v3.11? >=20 > -nc >=20 >=20 > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- >=20 Dear Nathanael, Alpine developers and users, We have been happily using the armhf / armv6 images for our project after s= witching from Raspbian for 6 months now.=20 The fact that Alpine is so lightweight and able to run from RAM makes it a = perfect fit for SBCs and other embedded low-powered devices. We find it esp= ecially convenient that an identical image can be built for every Raspberry= Pi on the market. Honestly, the roadmap has taken us by surprise and we might not have chosen= Alpine had we known that support for Raspberry Zero was being dropped this= soon. We fully understand that Alpine has limited resources and you want to focus= where it matters.=20 In my humble opinion, it would be wonderful to see support for alternative = architectures such as ARM and RISC be increased rather than reduced.=20 Alpine has been a breath of fresh air and we would very much like to contin= ue building on top of this unique distribution. We are fully committed to A= lpine and plan to upstream patches to installation scripts and continue to = help improve Raspberry support where we can. Please let me know if there are specific resources the project is worried a= bout where we could help. I would be delighted to continue working with Alp= ine for as long as possible.=20 In any case, I=E2=80=99d like to extend my thanks to you and the other deve= lopers for their contributions. Regards, Corvin Wimmer --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---