X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Received: from mail.squbes.com (squbes.com [208.74.142.49])
	by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E9517003B8C
	for <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BigMac.private.net (pool-70-23-214-157.ny325.east.verizon.net [70.23.214.157])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: nangel@nothome.org)
	by mail.squbes.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 325D45000A017;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <494037E7.7010309@nothome.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:43:03 -0500
From: Nathan Angelacos <nangel@nothome.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel
Precedence: list
List-Id: Alpine Development <alpine-devel.lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
	<mailto:alpine-devel+subscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harry Lachanas <grharry@freemail.gr>
CC: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] bridge + problems
References: <493FEC83.3020801@freemail.gr> <4940092B.30306@nothome.org> <49402037.2080008@freemail.gr>
In-Reply-To: <49402037.2080008@freemail.gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Harry Lachanas wrote:
> Thank's Nathan ....
> Thanks NC....
> 
>>
>>> BTW: No daemontools ?????  should I compile my own ??
>>
> Daemon tools from Dr Dan Bernstein <http://cr.yp.to/djb.html>

Yeah, I meant you compile the package, send NC whatever he needs for the 
makefile, and you get it in Alpine.

<snip>

>> By the way, thanks very much for your work on muli-isp failover - its 
>> VERY much appreciated!
>>
> There are grounds to polish this up ....
> For instance once U have 3 ISP profiders and they get about 33% of the 
> traffic once one goes down then one of the providers ( U decide which ) 
> gets about 66% of the traffic....
> 
> I think in order to do this better, other ( more underground and bad ) 
> modules have to be incorporated
> random ????
> ROUTE ????
> fuzzy ??
> nth ??
> 
> Then after that I think shorewall doesn't fit in there anymore .... ( We 
> better study and become experts on netfilter  :-( , but we'll avoid all 
> the sarcasm and sadism of shorewall lists :-)   )
> 
Speaking of shorewall, a buddy is looking at ferm 
http://ferm.foo-projects.org/ as a replacement for shorewall.


Take care!


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---