Received: from mx1.mailbun.net (mx1.mailbun.net [170.39.20.100]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DB2781007 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 10:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [172.56.7.59]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ariadne@dereferenced.org) by mx1.mailbun.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6092C11A535; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dereferenced.org; s=mailbun; t=1641118883; bh=BgFMQ/qSeyFXMeuU8tH9/YG3ZWNN0+Otjamf+TCUj6o=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LXLhtCJifcT7H1LGSxzsG8d0Tm8PqHXtI/rZjAkK4f/7F3aX6WLonahsfoqcXdIgs THEzR829hSKjOAe7Bip1hvtQqComo0A7drPz+MBVeOz9XaWqZ6W74m7Um5V626jQBI XIVxiN5WuLjHM+njfFBfVQtDqA5nrkAd2aqKFAI3SASz+vxwb7wLaViq5O7nK//vZq Olw5oQ0Vvaih/i5Po0MiPJ5hzyperIDw5K0bAKImX8AN7WbJnx7SKS5nXFgSvEchmR uwTquA8QnMKMgKHiWPkddpdaa5SipsXrkc+m/+GQvA5vEzGA4PbyUnVhuaFDCFm1Hu FaOfkIOmyNnpw== Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 04:21:15 -0600 (CST) From: Ariadne Conill To: Drew DeVault cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: Re-licensing the Alpine wiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <49b58698-c3d7-58fe-4745-5aa8b829e416@dereferenced.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hello, On Sun, 2 Jan 2022, Drew DeVault wrote: > Briefly discussed on IRC. > > The Alpine wiki has a weird non-free non-license: > >> All content is copyrighted by the original authors. It may not be >> republished in any form without prior permission. I believe this is the default license MediaWiki installs when you do not choose a free license, rather than any intentional decision. > https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Alpine_Linux:Privacy_policy#Copyright > > This should be corrected. I propose this procedure: > > 1. From a given cut-over date, all wiki edits following that date use > the GNU Free Documentation License[0]. > 2. A page is established on which all existing contributors can > voluntarily agree to retroactively relicense their contributions. > > This will cause the wiki to become more freely licensed over time, and > gives us a means of establishing the licensing situation for any > particular page should someone want to reuse it. Perhaps in a couple of > years we can re-evaluate the situation and nag a few stragglers for a > reliensing statement, or rewrite the last few pages which are still > nonfree. This seems like a reasonable plan. > I picked the GNU FDL essentially arbitrarily to reduce bikeshedding. The > Arch Wiki uses it, so there's some precedent. We could use Creative > Commons if someone really cares about it. I expect that this will be a > relatively straightforward, uncontroversial change. I think it would be better to use CC-BY-SA. This would be aligned with the Alpine Handbook, which is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0[0]. [0]: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/docs/user-handbook/-/blob/master/LICENSE Ariadne