X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.renta.net (mail.renta.net [203.25.238.7]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34EA1EFC00 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (60-240-81-28.static.tpgi.com.au [::ffff:60.240.81.28]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 markc@renta.net) by mail.renta.net with esmtp; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:44:16 +1000 id 00030037.4A7195A0.0000515C Message-ID: <4A71977D.1050809@renta.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:52:13 +1000 From: Mark Constable User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090719) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Where would x11/APKINDEX.tar.gz go? References: <4A7174A0.4040407@renta.net> <1248956606.19561.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1248956606.19561.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Natanael Copa wrote: > So, yes repo have been unstable latest week due to the index format > change. It should be working now. Sorry for the mess. Not at all. I understand you are in the middle of significant changes. I just hope you guys don't mind me making a lot of noise about things I probably should not be messing around with. apk --allow-untrusted update apk --allow-untrusted add xorg-server-dev Both worked smoothly so now I can proceed with building mrxvt :) *** FWIW, regarding x86_64, I just tried a test of chrooting into the alpine devel partition I have here from a x86_64 Archlinux kernel without using "linux32 chroot" (so uname -m == x86_64) and changed CFLAGS="-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe" in /etc/abuild.conf and tried building uclibc and ncurses... uclibc compiled but it was still a 32bit lib I think with a little (hopefully) tweaking to use libc/sysdeps/linux/x86_64/ and remove an obvious 32bit patch then I might be able to get a 64bit uclibc compiled. Maybe there is more involved but I do have the motivation to try. --markc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---