X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from sp4.qcslink.com (sp4.qcslink.com [200.35.147.4]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5821EBFF9 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 03:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sp4.qcslink.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sp4.qcslink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32CD1AAE4 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:53:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.252.6.35] (c-67-188-21-150.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.21.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nangel@nothome.org) by sp4.qcslink.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EFAC1A624 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:53:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D1FF6AA.9000503@nothome.org> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 19:53:14 -0800 From: Nathan Angelacos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Icedove/3.0.11 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Mono package References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On 01/01/11 19:42, Jeff Bilyk wrote: > Hey everyone, > > The question came up this evening about packaging mono (the goal was > for a web server, not for desktop .NET apps), and while the > prerequisites as far as packages shouldn't be a problem, nenolod > raised the legitimate question of whether it should be included in the > main tree due to the uncertainty with patents when it comes to Mono. > Thoughts? > My 2 cents on adding Mono to Alpine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StHwAffUNxo --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---