Message-ID: <4E9C466E.6010305@alpinelinux.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:14:54 -0700
From: Nathan Angelacos <nangel@alpinelinux.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111005 Icedove/3.1.15
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] autossh / SSH Persistent Tunnel
References: <CADVmKVC7YNzHQPEoHaeeXM6o+ctH07K+fA03-Qa3WGfdcB3VCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADVmKVC7YNzHQPEoHaeeXM6o+ctH07K+fA03-Qa3WGfdcB3VCg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Jeremy,

On 10/15/2011 06:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Has anyone on this list tried using autossh [1] to keep a persistent SSH
> tunnel going?  Or do you have a different / better approach to this or
> the following scenarios?
>
> Scenario 1:

OpenVPN with the "client-to-client" configuration setting.

All clients can then see each other, no need for an extra ssh process - 
you should have native IP connectivity between the two clients.

>
> Scenario 2:

I've seen a GRE tunnel used things like that; actually OpenNHRP + IPSec 
does /exactly/ what you are wanting to do.


Or you can just go with OpenVPN "client-to-client" again.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---