Received: from out.migadu.com (out.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A0D782C56 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Migadu outbound); Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:35:37 +0000 Authentication-Results: out.migadu.com; auth=pass (login) Received: from [10.147.152.52] (mobile-166-176-251-175.mycingular.net [166.176.251.175]) by out.migadu.com (Haraka/2.8.16) with ESMTPSA id 1799345C-8A60-4D4F-81F0-E53F9D081CC5.1 envelope-from (authenticated bits=0) (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 verify=FAIL); Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:35:36 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:35:33 -0500 From: Ariadne Conill To: Drew DeVault , Rasmus Thomsen , Cosmo Borsky , =?utf-8?Q?=7Ealpine/devel?= <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org> Message-ID: <4c140756-b287-48a0-9d81-bc7421f72743@localhost> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Does it make sense to keep ~alpine/aports running? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EdoMail5e6289e5_4103f5d1_359" DKIM-Signature: v=1;a=rsa-sha256;bh=7rWEApoQEl1/9yrpLunKbTZeDXDP8HZgWlb7OpyMIGk=;c=relaxed/simple;d=dereferenced.org;h=from:subject:date:to;s=default;b=DnkxaZ8I986IxSQF35BdzXzFTiXkHKU2y7yDg2sVyvsd1xxWPGHF5JG2XuvRP336yQrsO8deQSesfzpbYpAeBHi9uqt33swu7u9/ztlqKcNnOltovli5E7mXLgq3yRe65tjYggqBMnep95r6C5KiBBxlfJUDveYgBYihHkQF5Xw= --EdoMail5e6289e5_4103f5d1_359 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, > > On Mar 6, 2020 at 8:23 AM, Drew DeVault wrote: > > > > On Fri Mar 6, 2020 at 6:13 AM, Rasmus Thomsen wrote: > * No CI. I see there's a todo for that in sr.ht and I don't mean to > disrespect anyone's efforts - sr.ht is a lot better than other ML > things for me already :), but we _still_ don't have CI on there, so I'm > not exactly hopeful that we'll get it soon. The ticket doesn't show much, but there has been consistent progress on this for some time now. Here's the current workstream: https://github.com/libgit2/pygit2/pull/982 A key point here that others have not raised is that this would require either moving the gitlab CI to use builds.sr.ht or maintaining two sets of CI. I doubt either is truly worth it, as the alternate CI is probably less featureful in gitlab. Ariadne --EdoMail5e6289e5_4103f5d1_359 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hello,

On Mar 6, 2020 at 8:23 AM, Drew DeV= ault <sir=40cmpwn.com> wrote: 

On =46ri Mar 6, 2020 at 6:13 AM, Rasmus Thomsen wrote: > * No CI. I see there's a todo for that in sr.ht and I don't mean to > disrespect anyone's efforts - sr.ht is a lot better than other ML > things for me already :), but we =5Fstill=5F don't have CI on there,= so I'm > not exactly hopeful that we'll get it soon. The ticket doesn't show much, but there has been consistent progress on this for some time now. Here's the current workstream: https://github.com/libgit2/pygit2/pull/982
A key point = here that others have not raised is that this would require either moving= the gitlab CI to use builds.sr.ht or maintaining two sets of CI.  I= doubt either is truly worth it, as the alternate CI is probably less fea= tureful in gitlab.

Ariadne
--EdoMail5e6289e5_4103f5d1_359--