Reply-To: vkrishn4@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] RFC: Fixing license field in APKBUILDs (or a bit
 more)
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
References: <1614404acdb.edd44d4135179.3833405768989653606@zoho.com>
 <CA+T2pCGAS+ehDKb60JQR8J6ixASGfjfOzQQe4A-UCgHFg=1K2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+T2pCFFNCc+tk-tsjHnRzsEB3X_CNbRRysA2qf5PtvU0MGp=g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
From: "V.Krishn" <vkrishn4@gmail.com>
Organization: Insteps.net
Message-ID: <4c90173d-2a9d-63b8-8027-304d85154fb4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 23:51:07 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+T2pCFFNCc+tk-tsjHnRzsEB3X_CNbRRysA2qf5PtvU0MGp=g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/01/2018 01:05 AM, William Pitcock wrote:
> After discussing with jirutka, we came to the conclusion that SPDX 2
> shorthand identifiers are fine as long as they are not vague.  For
> example "GPL-2.0+" is equally valid to "GPL-2.0-or-later".  This
> resolves the main gripe that Adelie has with SPDX 3.

Maybe introduce a file aports (eg. main/busybox/apkbuild.meta)
which also keeps aliases, eg. for "GPL-2.0+" is equally valid to
"GPL-2.0-or-later" (json format) along with other metas,
or a single file in eg aports/.meta OR aports/.meta/aliases

-- 
Regards,
V.Krishn


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---