X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B55DDC00F8 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80AB4476F; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:56:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1412931414; bh=KIfCM1GNKkc3fvGBkSiw6eDg3OMCF0W72grSJBy4Kg0=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mOZ0FvOXtFxW0dQWWyB1KGQKdRWWI2G9O5VR+GskmEGPfeVaJ/NJYbrmY5PNHg+o9 xKC9Ix+WsEom1/yMiWhOuirAYSfJm9g23/YovU4yVrNtibH07Hcf2Rr622W4EgAkyc F7DHykQ2BcDydphQRrUPFYPYL0ICjRBBsObxnHsc= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: roger.newman) with ESMTPSA id A344542707 Message-ID: <54379EB2.7000101@riseup.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:54:10 +0200 From: Roger Newman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlo Landmeter , Timo Teras CC: Alpine-devel Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] apk-tools work-in-progress References: <20141008131721.747fcc9d@vostro> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean >> >> >> If you have new patchsets, old ones that are rebased, something I missed >> or just other ideas for apk-tools, please reply to this mail. >> >> > One of the missing features in apk-tools (I've had this question multiple > times on IRC) is the ability of query packages file list when not installed. > I think we have discussed this before, but I though I would just bump it > again to see what you think about it. > Maybe add an switch to generate an alternative database which we can query > after it has been generated locally? > > -carlo > I like the idea of getting a list of files without installing the pkg. Was asking that this morning on IRC. +1 from my side for that feature. - Roger --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---