X-Original-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92846DC0540 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428E9DC003A for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220BF20970 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:52:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qGsVW6W8dz5vNB for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:52:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Latest OpenSSL with SSLv2/weak ciphers enabled To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org References: From: "hasufell@posteo.de" Message-ID: <56D9A131.8040308@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:52:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On 03/03/2016 04:07 AM, Apocalyptic Bunyip wrote: > +1 for LibreSSL > +1 This should have been enough of a warning that OpenSSL is unreliable in a lot of ways. Some linux distros already provide LibreSSL support (mostly source distros though). It requires some patching and work, but since Alpine is on musl already, you are probably familiar with the consequences of supporting such a thing. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---