Received: from mx1.mailbun.net (mx1.mailbun.net [170.39.20.100]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53A07810DB for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2607:fb90:d983:1d8:e070:381b:a0bf:3b01] (unknown [172.58.104.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ariadne@dereferenced.org) by mx1.mailbun.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A82C011AACB; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:10:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dereferenced.org; s=mailbun; t=1642713051; bh=CKbDc5Y92FVLotHVe4YZ7SMEjWiogWrdUXBVs6jbuW0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=EF8SQb8iER2FJuZVLwyPcPfQGJQQ+g2hkc9EUKZ6J013QE8oMGoJZwdVwXwxjhnhb ivrqbEj6jhwkbHI96Y7mSQJJzWZ2emCDr568YRQ8r3cUF4D9TqdeClm69y6PnwrBlr 9Bm7eulstoLOHeg2tbXraS1ZMMsLVGLi1ogsBRJ4kKNklsXUVKwcd6eaLo/2Dr/TuK 0069zefXJOqey14HEaRq7StaOJEv2AFHp7fmCWosM0+un4zw72IzL7uS74OovERe9k IVp3U9tx6M7aR3lkt1vv7rPl5bBBLOb3jugnXzija9lTzPSvoZNf0+NixEPbedaxGm AWAl7G3s+JnMg== Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:10:46 -0600 (CST) From: Ariadne Conill To: Nulo cc: Nico Schottelius , ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: Experiencing harmful behavior in Alpine In-Reply-To: <20220120204412.6ormplwhusy32enq@x69> Message-ID: <5ea29d77-220-e420-c619-3faf72b786d@dereferenced.org> References: <20220120180617.rvboyscx2oz5r3wu@x69> <87ee522q7x.fsf@ungleich.ch> <20220120204412.6ormplwhusy32enq@x69> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi, On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Nulo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:46:45PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote: >> I've heard about it the first time on your URL and I think it is correct >> behaviour to escalate if a conflict is not being resolved. >> >> However, I have to add that a public posting outside of this >> mailinglist is probably not going to calm down the situation. > > I already tried to solve this on the IRC room many times and failed to > do so; besides, I believe that having a publicly available archive of > these kinds of things is important. I only posted this link publicly to > this mailing list, and even then, it is public mailing list with public > linkable archives. I think the appropriate thing to do would have been to escalate to the Alpine Council, per the governance structure of the project. For future reference, issues can be raised with the Council on the Council's issue tracker: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/new > >> I can offer both you as well as mps the role of a mediator. Not in any >> kind of official Alpine role, but as to resolve a conflict that is >> related to work around Alpine. > > Thank you for the offer! However, as I said in the post, I already > tried coming to an agreement with Ariadne as a mediator and failed to > do so. The Council has already opened a work item to do a CoC inquiry against mps: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/11 I think it would be better to take this conversation to that ticket, so that everything is documented in one place, rather than have it on the Alpine lists. Ariadne