X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C585C4738 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 17:18:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([178.0.41.59]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001 [74.208.5.15]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lx87b-1e6r8p2i9h-016fv9 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 19:18:23 +0200 Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Code of Conduct To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org References: <412A395A-202C-490A-B113-C5580CCD4AE4@shiz.me> <7e304eda-7ffc-6bd0-87ec-76c12f0f2e3b@mail.com> <9f90daa2-b74a-2c1d-0411-ba095d842f99@mail.com> From: 7heo <7heo@mail.com> Message-ID: <76bddf47-8f79-ab8b-1624-d51c4a7dfa65@mail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 19:18:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f90daa2-b74a-2c1d-0411-ba095d842f99@mail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JFIiJsBc26tJa05s90Vy3DKw5rvTRccVXthRD3mx16ck/npX4EG Gm99Q0nhcUmc4h/CK1TSKrGF6VVmr6ihAtEI7wVXifu6iAU1XedeEgtQIGDoxIpml4NmI0m d9ss8dC/s1kwaM897HAI6+EU+xaHV/iUVZT/gKNL4bkyFwBMmAeHjHojcSmiKPjDCl7ybhZ uiwX0KsJdazKaEqlw40Pg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TDA3fbyjt1g=:6AZZPVZnKWXCS67Fl3vYBI xV0wNWsSB8qfnnta8dbnZ7/+Ne9oz4noFetHXUfi82+Y0fEVQP8OjXGIiOAeYRvV2UwT0FXUE lfr4pxSQNmkRYRvIyuCNPWeJQY1PTBsU5PQ3tMy5ChePzjrJGAKKo2L6YhdySwVykSp0ZrBpL SJqJ71HqGpkLSKEBUGcz0t3vFW6hKuaAifZyjie8jftwQ5Np2cYeY89JYps0wTOQsLGGk7jDy f90q+Wg885zaBeaN9wWTnKigQ9OdufTx04UDdruGmeWNhGugToIzEbuK5sb4igvWhaa0Tco5E mACiZoEkQ6HkaezdXpCLf4xA70/9R5/WsWW2JPg0wQvo0mQ31BT6Vc4FkioXHuFq5SkVJr+UV obT+DWA00cUemQ1ijxdX6VFuGNeCukgemMxFo8ycQ1KXnAsJQnmO6P+qEYPLHPRJsSK73iEfa MX0LnFF9YH+xMvzkraC2C0KQJX6/rilmCwPGG7qE7LIHVJJYjBjRZ3pANHWsc6d6l1BKDj4G7 wOMCVGggaQNIAKvCQqHD5XHKai+I5uojIMh6STLjLiqsFRhUi6njtCbkrDqPdI4sySRDlSJP9 7Vs6g/vhmAoaDATv77ccsYaL2ooHkpWuBrS9lRbPiQZVm1heNK9XWw3SA+1+3VM/PzRwoBy// an4rfoGmLRzOJwg5cGDbRX1XGaX/USM8mNq/t8qZwQWkGcBU9JH4kDgS+DjYD++gfHqlFOoC9 FAA0Yvfj5mzoocz1xslCtGEH9vF6n4y18DQNPFEKMYuxX3D3R59wL2uZg8eKxBKs4YqSpw3hi TS21TFY Breno Leitao makes a good point about the language barrier; and I will be thinking of a way to re-add the "good faith" point without giving too much space for it to be a loophole. On 5/13/2017 7:11 PM, 7heo wrote: > Dear Laurent, > > I am glad that what I understood from what you wrote wasn't what you > meant. I am sorry for the misinterpretation. > > I couldn't agree more with your suggestion for the addition to point 4. > > I will then proceed to ask my friends, and the friends of friends, who > are (but not only) related, or directly in LGBT groups and minorities. > > Here is the most recent draft, with the current additions and redaction: > > Alpine (AKA Alpine-Linux and Alpine-OS) Code of Conduct (CoC) > ============================================================= > > 1. This CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and > enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for > any person who is willing to contribute in a safe, respectful, > productive and collaborative way. It is especially not meant as an > exhaustive law, to automate moderation, or to prevent thinking. > > 2. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > of personal attacks, doxing, and disparaging remarks of any kind, > including, but not limited to, racial, ethnic, gender-related, > religious, political, sexual-orientation related slur. > > 3. This CoC does not condone nor excuse censorship; or the exclusion of > those acting in good faith towards Alpine. Censorship should never > happen unless required by law. > > 4. Any sustained disruption of the collaborative space (mailing lists, > IRC etc.) or other Alpine events shall be construed as a violation of > this CoC and appropriate action will be taken by the Alpine community > moderators. Excessive lobbying or continuously engaging the Alpine > community on non-technical matters is a disruption of the collaborative > space and also a violation of the CoC. > > 5. Any amendment made to this CoC should be approved unanimously by all > Alpine developers (i.e. all people who have commit rights on the > repositories). > > 6. The CoC is only about interaction with the Alpine community. Your > private and public lives outside of the Alpine community are your own. > Any issue arising outside of the Alpine community and not directly > technically related with the Alpine maintained software shall neither be > discussed nor arbitrated within the community. > > > On 5/12/2017 1:50 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote: >>> The human rights were written, to the top of my knowledge, by white men >> >> Yeah, well, there was no Internet at the time, so it wasn't easy to >> communicate with people outside of your main circle. Apples and oranges. >> >> >>> It's not because we have predominant common factors that we will be >>> unable to comprehend or perceive challenges that others undure. >> >> It is exactly because we are not exposed to challenges that we may fail >> to perceive them. I have experienced this first-hand. Pretending to be >> able to foresee everything is just hubris; if we are going to have a CoC >> ready for when the community has grown and needs one, I'd rather have it >> done right. >> >> >>> We are all Humans, and the paragraph two is meant as a catch-all for >>> abuses towards Humans (if I remember correctly, awilfox was supporting >>> it, saying something along the lines of "no personal attacks, and >>> you're good"), no matter their individual characteristics. >> >> Sure, and that's fine with me, too. But is there any harm in running >> it by >> people who may have a different perspective, just to be sure? >> >> >>> Making it more explicit, and detailing each case is a role a refuse to >>> take, as it will exponentially increase the pain of discussing and >>> redacting the CoC; >> >> That's not what I suggested. >> I know you thought people would make that suggestion and so you felt >> compelled to address it, but as it turns out, I didn't. Please react to >> what I wrote, not to what you think I would write. And for the record, >> I agree with you on that point. >> >> >>> In short I'm not against asking around, but please be careful who you >>> ask: if this becomes the kind of long and complicated debate >>> attracting mobs of lobbyists from any side >> >> That is *also* not what I wrote. As a matter of fact, since it's >> something >> that really does endanger open source projects and often flies under the >> radar, I am in favor of adding a mention to paragraph 4 that would say >> something like: excessive lobbying or engaging the Alpine community on >> non-technical matters *is* a disruption of the collaborative space and a >> violation of the CoC. (In other words: make it clear that >> politics, drama or any other kind of noise => out.) >> >> >>> Let's make our CoC as we like our software. Simple, reliable, and small. >> >> Yes. And to me, reliability includes checks from people with more >> experience than we have in these matters. >> >> -- >> Laurent >> >> >> >> --- >> Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org >> Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org >> --- >> > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---