X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from zimbra.netvantix.net (zimbra.netvantix.net [67.213.231.181]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692FD1EBFF7 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.netvantix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B44E2582E2 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:28:42 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.netvantix.net Received: from zimbra.netvantix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.netvantix.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elsTHUE8kzcO for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:28:37 -0700 (MST) Received: from zimbra.netvantix.net (zimbra.netvantix.net [67.213.231.181]) by zimbra.netvantix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F1E2582E0 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:28:37 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:28:37 -0700 (MST) From: Steve Fink To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Message-ID: <7876411.3993.1291933717547.JavaMail.root@zimbra.netvantix.net> In-Reply-To: <33123112.3990.1291933393809.JavaMail.root@zimbra.netvantix.net> Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] OpenVPN Multiple Tunnels X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3992_17134051.1291933717546" X-Originating-IP: [174.52.152.3] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.3_GA_1915.RHEL4 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Mac)/6.0.3_GA_1915.RHEL4) ------=_Part_3992_17134051.1291933717546 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for your response. I believe understand the methodology, but it is in direct contrast to the OpenVPN documented methodology. For example under the OpenVPN documented methodology of having the single init.d script (openvpn): You can issue: openvpn start and all tunnels will come up You can issue: openvpn stop and all tunnels will come down You can issue: openvpn restart and all tunnels will be restarted or You can issue: openvpn client restart and only the tunnel named client is restarted. Under the (I'm assuming here) Gentoo methodology of having essentially one init.d script for each tunnel you cannot start/stop/restart all of the tunnels at once you would have to issue each command separately. Am I correct here? BTW, I apologize in advance. I am not at all familiar with Gentoo, please forgive my ignorance. Since your initial response about OpenRC not liking the init.d script, that's where I've been digging and I believe you are correct. I am back on the trail! Best, Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Angelacos" To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 3:03:15 PM Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] OpenVPN Multiple Tunnels fwiw.. I'm running alpinelinux 2.1.2 with multiple openvpn tunnels: ln -s /etc/init.d/openvpn /etc/init.d/openvpn.SanFrancisco rc-update add openvpn.SanFrancisco rc-update add openvpn The config files are named : /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf /etc/openvpn/SanFrancisco.conf --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org --- ------=_Part_3992_17134051.1291933717546 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'= >Thank you for your response.

I believe understand the m= ethodology, but it is in direct contrast to the OpenVPN documented methodol= ogy.

For example under the OpenVPN documented methodolog= y of having the single init.d script (openvpn):

Yo= u can issue: openvpn start and all tunnels will come up

You can i= ssue: openvpn stop and all tunnels will come down

You can issue: = openvpn restart and all tunnels will be restarted

Yo= u can issue: openvpn client restart and only the tunnel named client is res= tarted.

Under the (I'm assuming here) Gentoo metho= dology of having essentially one init.d script for each tunnel you cannot s= tart/stop/restart all of the tunnels at once you would have to issue each c= ommand separately.

Am I correct here?

BTW, I apologize in advance. I am not at all familiar with Gen= too, please forgive my ignorance.

Since your initi= al response about OpenRC not liking the init.d script, that's where I've be= en digging and I believe you are correct. I am back on the trail!

Best,

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Angelacos" = <nangel@nothome.org>
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Sen= t: Thursday, December 9, 2010 3:03:15 PM
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Ope= nVPN Multiple Tunnels

fwiw..

I'm running alpinelinux 2.1.2 wi= th multiple openvpn tunnels:

ln -s /etc/init.d/openvpn /etc/init.d/o= penvpn.SanFrancisco

rc-update add openvpn.SanFrancisco
rc-update = add openvpn

The config files are named :
/etc/openvpn/openvpn.con= f
/etc/openvpn/SanFrancisco.conf

---
Unsubscri= be: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: &n= bsp; alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---

------=_Part_3992_17134051.1291933717546-- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---