Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [66.245.177.37]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4357782E01 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F49B580A8; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yavin4.bsod.eu (unknown [172.21.190.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: francesco@bsod.eu) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A36BB5809F; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:58:14 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 11:58:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0 From: "Francesco Colista" Message-ID: <7a7d9e02aa8ace5183aa9d994e282558@alpinelinux.org> Subject: Re: [3.15] System change proposal: rename the Alpine 3.15 release to Alpine 15 To: "Shiz" , "Nico Schottelius" Cc: "Ariadne Conill" , "Zach van Rijn" , ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org In-Reply-To: <53F16841-6ABC-4887-AC36-F6EE20010CAE@shiz.me> References: <53F16841-6ABC-4887-AC36-F6EE20010CAE@shiz.me> <3824aef2-8af2-d33a-47e3-c7c66bd6615e@dereferenced.org> <8fa74683a260e4e9af058fa015e72d44574ad995.camel@zv.io> <28fd9b1a-878d-edc1-d5d0-899b3c5ffc9a@dereferenced.org> <87a6q73ogd.fsf@ungleich.ch> 9 aprile 2021 11:23, "Shiz" wrote:=0A=0A>> I've to confess I= 'm with Zach here. Alpine 4 would be much more logical=0A>> than doing a = jump to Alpine 15. I personally think it will actually give=0A>> the wron= g impression as everyone will see it as a "marketing joke=E2=80=9D.=0A> = =0A> +1.=0A> =0A=0A+1 fpr Alpine 4=0A=0A.: Francesco Colista=0A.: Alpine = Linux Core Dev Team