X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.toastin.space (mail.toastin.space [207.246.93.162]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109FDF854E6 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.toastin.space (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toastin.space (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 20d571e1; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:16:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=toastin.space; h=subject :to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=ml; bh=HLOeD8b2glnGNj ilwqbEd4yuhC4=; b=Qh/VZU35Ya25SS3BOctmBWOqdvyJSZahFTvjlQg9ptNQPE SH8tk7xwrOg9Mc7zKXBuC71xmPdEVJl8XlyPAuV/Z6oD55fZO8DbNegolrb8EiYQ 5dOOsWrnjTyW52MZEiO5byNTFxBe6Shw+ubsK2xhGZaTM9W3kP31h3vw7uEhZSm7 QPgfha64nFUXWhfz/IeogjOsc3zaCoLLUqHV43y+QcCmuf5efq5nXQ1wIqaVU/TW 8WZumWZPnyYkznawITP9hKV/6DY3twVK+4nWYfGz4Y8EQp2QF3ltneZvf8tqT52o cS17dKByn3N6R++eBct+eVAts7p+yux/HL2mHNVQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=toastin.space; h=subject:to :cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=ml; b=ZXkngoFX xPvxeGifAhz18rb4EH5rSbVNCFfzM0WtA9hDl15Ce6jTfR/cVRsg4mwS27gkQOuu njzYZG+pseUSdprgchQXYDq/DiZvjqWh0VYW3JI7nNCnI77FnBtMip3VDCgiC219 UsM2/cDCU/oF3cTP7GmF+sNXfUquLLGUZ4Y3sMKM/Il7KCmrP/CLTtnQLgfFL3Ch tN3U0C4NYbzcfQ1WOtfV1+W15wbXAEpHjIQVZnYYLUCw/Fly2GES8r7yISi1cvjp s063+4ue4l7fSa/NFTxGGaDw9syur60YoJhUUxDrmn6T+AEWjhaURuhoa7VYj2lg 9L2cisNBt5m0ag== Received: from [192.168.0.135] (173-246-15-165.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.15.165]) by mail.toastin.space (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6eb20f9d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:16:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Teams and organisation To: Natanael Copa Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org, Daniel Isaksen References: <20190301214806.47a05e54@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> <809b52be-9b7a-6e9b-4a57-0ea1c0118954@toastin.space> <20190314171131.5afe7af0@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> From: Chloe Kudryavtsev Message-ID: <7d0e3f9f-8f5a-1926-02c8-4fdee7a614c0@toastin.space> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:16:00 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/66.0 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190314171131.5afe7af0@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/14/2019 12:11 PM, Natanael Copa wrote: > This has been suggested before. Wilcox had some good points and > suggestions[1]. I agree with the following points: - People can often identify with their specific project even moreso than with the distribution. - Having dedicated teams for languages - this isn't necessary, but is very useful when there is sufficient interest. However, I have several issues with the idea being presented there. Specifically: - Some level of formality is needed - this helps avoid a bottlenecking situation, and enforces separation of tasks (minimizing context-switching and thus increasing total throughput). - A license-oriented team likely isn't needed per-se. We have since started using the SPDX license list, so the remaining bits can be handled by the core and aports teams (depending on the specifics). The reality is that that suggestion was made in the middle of 2017, and the situation has changed, but it's certainly something to look at. > And we need this badly. We are not lacking volunteers, but problem is > that I have become in a position that everything blocks on me. I want > fix that. It also means that you (and other core/infra developers) tend to be extremely busy. One of the goals would be to lessen your load (and allow you to, at the same time, be more efficient at the things that you *do* still do :) ). > What would be the simplest way to get this started? We already have a > semi-team for infra, with Carlo as team lead. > > We could probably also get a docs team running immediately, with Chloe > as team lead. > > That would be a good start I think. Currently, the plan (as discussed in #alpine-docs, because that's where the conversation happened to have happened) is to have a meeting on Sunday, 14:00 GMT. I'm currently composing a proposed agenda for it. During it, things such as the initial teams should be decided, after which (likely Monday) a final version would be submitted for approval by the core team. Once approval happens, I'll initialize a developer-handbook repository (even if it'll likely be a bit until more things get added to it) and populate it with everything that'll have been decided during the meeting (and potentially revised during the, hopefully short, approval process). As a side note, I agree with your initial set of teams, though I think the core and aport teams should also be made at the start, along with a full member listing. --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---