Received: from mail.cogitri.dev (mail.cogitri.dev [207.180.226.74]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571E6782B84 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:44:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Yes Message-ID: <83e208048a862b0b0ff8141463d556f387b55527.camel@mail.cogitri.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.cogitri.dev; s=mail; t=1584693887; bh=0+2SeOz+VFnEABqK5Tgfe5/e8OTXsAddZ0mmZYOm7o4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=UwW1mc71oFj6d0bTZEPs5zJ24u+nz0uRtJzO49MY08Je/oRjiCVVKMLRJBzghSMvA G5ZjPwy1KJLS9i8nAQ+4JvhjbrYKyPSugvyTOu07QWux/7M2N26UwxTGB79gIwjsS+ /Az0+K4c+rRmVy+ZI/nvf64e3WFJ/Ps/G910oK4mlfH+JjQ3jsJfVtUAXIFviTTxNT zYVbUp/YJE5/cL683HSIDVZxRoTFNrQwdH9bEJgptmeCWgAEH11A+tU9E0vl7GpocD 6blchRrx+bZPm2b3jHhCn5vr5EWRsR7SQu8ivTeJjUaOuDzrQOjzHpty46D3tVNNTu U7kxdF5YFk1jw== Subject: Re: Proposed change: drop busybox iproute2, always use real iproute2 From: Rasmus Thomsen To: Timo Teras , Ariadne Conill Cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:44:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200320102110.565ad389@vostro.wlan> References: <20200320102110.565ad389@vostro.wlan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 10:21 +0200, Timo Teras wrote: > Hi, > > I understand this makes perfect sense for routers, firewalls and even > some network appliances. > > However, for embedded setups like RPis, and similar, this can be an > unnecessary weight. I think for many setups iproute2 isn't strictly necessary - if it wasn't for openVPN needing it I wouldn't have it installed on any of my devices. > I personally would not do this. It also opens the same reasoning for > other busybox tools. Most of the utilities there are reduced in > functionality somehow. And there's specific target groups that the > real > version is preferred and needed. That's why we make them available. +1 on that, many of the Busybox tools don't provide (nearly) as much functionality as e.g. the GNU Coreutils versions (and we regularly trip over that on CI), e.g. mktemp or ln. I feel like we should keep using busybox and just make it as easy as possible for users to install alternative packages if they so desire. > In other words, I'd rather not do this. But if majority thinks > otherwise, then sure. > > I would hope that many comment/vote on this. > > Thanks, > Timo > > > Regards, Rasmus (Also, offtopic, this is one of the first mails from my mail server because protonmail doesn't like sending non-html mail right now. Sorry if I land in your spam (a note about that would be appreciated :).