Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FD1782DEE for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0F939C41; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:56:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZovk7nZ6_S5; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:56:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1579885006; bh=54WIS/jBS6QGieohdCjp+8I1rbmUb4Czf3RB+0650pg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=QsV2Ek313/FNEUKd2xQQOoC/vUuvqd01cVOHROvozL6hllpfxrWWJvEuUpiemM/JK OnckZg9XkZdHVI4Ye+iBTm4Z8mA7YOeEwfwqPCzjaEAd5sFHpVgtDgpcLg9rupHFiV 1vqICXoDZDKUuyu7OZ6S1+SBuczA6LemaxAAASfN2SvrATogqPIxvIYTX2wIiB7kJa 0jp8ZsOkbPter1JO+JXkzMzwdTspWSe6nmEDLltDpC7UGBUa4klIFqBulx1lMqpxDv gLPWl9IY+guOGNCVhfQhEKq5/Ut7oIRytBGZ+uToS3M/Lx2n3j4TJLn5PnhC5/exLl 9zWZKCbuK5MKw== From: Bart Ribbers To: Wolf Cc: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Message-ID: <9b2c838c-b992-4803-b99e-df012273205b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20200124165114.cbz5i7xdaup2emjc@wolfsden.cz> References: <20200124165114.cbz5i7xdaup2emjc@wolfsden.cz> Subject: Re: Where are musl-utils developed? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <9b2c838c-b992-4803-b99e-df012273205b@localhost> Hi, musl-utils is part of the regular Musl package in Alpine (as in, it's a subpackage), which means the source is developed with musl upstream. https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/main/musl/APKBUILD#n21 Hope this helps, Bart 24 Jan 2020 17:51:45 Wolf : > Hello, > > I've beging making few patches for musl-utils with intention of > upstreaming them (== sending them here) and then I realized that I > actually have no idea if they are really developed in aports tree or if > they live in some separate repository somewhere and changes are just > copied over. > > At the same time it feels weird there are no tests whatsoever, but > putting them directly into aports seems weird. So, where are musl-utils > developed? Is it directly on aports? > > > > Thanks, > W. > > -- > There are only two hard things in Computer Science: > cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. >