Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F99078114B for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 19:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: contact@markand.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A0DFFF804 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 19:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by postfix.malikania.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8CC811F68 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:11:50 +0100 (CET) From: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\)) Subject: Re: Availability of cross toolchains in aports Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:11:50 +0100 References: <2GOGSSHRSVVSP.3CGZ50E0W9AFA@8pit.net> To: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org In-Reply-To: <2GOGSSHRSVVSP.3CGZ50E0W9AFA@8pit.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81) > On 16 Feb 2022, at 14:52, S=C3=B6ren Tempel = wrote: >=20 > However, there have been occasional discussions on IRC if Alpine = should switch from GCC > to Clang anyhow. Maybe this yet another argument for this switch? I=E2=80=99m currently creating a Linux distribution similar to Alpine in = spirit but it=E2=80=99s based on a fully LLVM environment (not even = libgcc or binutils) and I can tell you that it=E2=80=99s a total = nightmare. Many packages use gcc extensions and do not compile fine under clang. = Even though I strongly advise clang as default compiler, it still = requires a non neglecting patch sets. =E2=80=94=20 David=