DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=ApirX//FdV4wTJ5z9O6EG4wityp6P22yOlA3jS5RxBabcMcy1sBXN4HNCGmoM1nEPO
         cFisT8SqV3S09169tF8LI2wERuTsHw0RNQ2/MDSsAf21jJQpVHpugMh/IGOULy6KpuAt
         llqawAw10YIuVe26pFYPsAP7lkqiKq7Fg+D+g=
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 22:42:28 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTik_n4zC8XLsGbCOmA+AxFZ5oFMyHjdPuvbN_iHK@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [alpine-devel] Mono package
From: Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com>
To: Alpine Development <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey everyone,

The question came up this evening about packaging mono (the goal was
for a web server, not for desktop .NET apps), and while the
prerequisites as far as packages shouldn't be a problem, nenolod
raised the legitimate question of whether it should be included in the
main tree due to the uncertainty with patents when it comes to Mono.
Thoughts?

-- 
Jeff


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---