X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED971EBFF5 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so4739022iyb.13 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:27:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=se88VaKul6LZawWaqDl1+Y5sii0jcJXUyxgOU0JLw2I=; b=DLLmw+MRn5cRIerbR0F8UH+cbbM01sKDPm0gfvBKyQRUMBD/2Y+VlH0QqX2UjUj7p8 prPkiTiTzKevzmb3epymHPaoytXGTHffnVcE3xwUvP9t6+9GDgYOPsjEZetuZLSVWkL8 nOmAvnEbGuQTtKMvdyBD/a08Ek7bS81cs6V00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CnMpWIanQ/31L+L4JvBsHcUhhNbqUuVZJ4Kuczaq74TFJ/e3d1BpxKLYKq1Pn34Iu4 t7iyv/+FxYpUge7vz5cOtRrIBO4KURmbNe/5u/31uYs9X3GdA8OPJxGFnEqz8qoz6SNo l28uX0xDSmrfbuq7dWoD+K/a6K7BR4Z5E0ASg= X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.35.195 with SMTP id q3mr2839015ibd.186.1297682867886; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.12 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:27:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:27:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine package browser From: Carlo Landmeter To: francesco@bsod.eu Cc: Alpine-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Francesco Colista wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:49:24 +0100, Carlo Landmeter > wrote: >> I have been talking on IRC about setting up a package browser for our >> APK repo's. > >> * Python APKINDEX parser >> * APKINDEX format (possible to get additional information like >> maintainer/contributor...) >> * Parser linking to git/buildbot for updates >> * APK SQL database schema >> * Drupal as Package browser (or do we prefer ACF) >> * APK browser features compared Arch/others >> * Additional features/information like git rss viewer > > I agree with all this point. > I think (IMHO) is better to use the ACF + Lua. > It's the standard alpine framework, is fast, and Ted will appreciate > some helps :) If Ted is up to this task to develop this in ACF + Lua then i would endorse it. This means all new functions/features will also be developed, do we want that or should we use existing solutions and focus on development of Alpine Linux? > > My two cents. > -- > :: Francesco :: > Jabber: francesco@jabber.org > E-Mail: francesco@bsod.eu > GnuPG: FE9DDD5F > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---