DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=KJp944IEbnYsWpeXVUfZCzFo9+FN7iJ5pCZLk+c1hQD+8LhfoaLAMCwezS0IMNOFD8
         f83hD3+ePTiC/HESCGejuJYxW28nvct/euEjlo88iuwYCEU3z13mfvbCjUt99XaMrW3i
         keSl9rqsjycnjBuwmQpUqotJZHfGXTFl1HK1o=
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50bb473f48ce3aab63e8206ccf85da2d@127.0.0.1>
References: <AANLkTimF+B+BFgv3W40mr6hOvSC2-i__JzD08qw1YWw-@mail.gmail.com>
	<ae76329461bdcd0ce9ac9356a3b0aa58@127.0.0.1>
	<AANLkTimN=XEmgvHyaMuEqiAhEf++A7iuhKagpkyCspDH@mail.gmail.com>
	<50bb473f48ce3aab63e8206ccf85da2d@127.0.0.1>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:47:37 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAipBhbyU=_=t_+x9ARgGrnVjubm_1jAnTvME4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine package browser
From: Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com>
To: Francesco <francesco@bsod.eu>
Cc: Alpine-devel <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Francesco,

I'd agree that ideally we'd like this in ACF+lua since long-term, that
keeps both tools (ACF and package browser) on a common platform.  It
also would have the advantage, like you say, of having someone else
who'd be able to then contribute to ACF, which is good for the
long-term (and I'm sure Ted wouldn't mind having the help).  That
being said, if those who are going to implement this solution (most
likely nenolod and clandmeter iirc) prefer another language, like
python, then I'm more inclined to say "lets get something out the
door", especially something that imho would be a nice feature for the
Alpine site.  If down the road it could be incorporated into ACF,
that'd be great.  Just my 0.02$.

Jeff

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Francesco <francesco@bsod.eu> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:27:47 +0100, Carlo Landmeter
> <clandmeter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Francesco Colista
>> <francesco.colista@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If Ted is up to this task to develop this in ACF + Lua then i would
>> endorse it.
>> This means all new functions/features will also be developed, do we
>> want that or should we use existing solutions and focus on development
>> of Alpine Linux?
>
> Dunno if Ted has time to develop this feature, we should ask to him.
> I'm just wondering that we should use the actual existing framework and
> add features to it.
> If someone is available to write lua code for ACF and helps Ted, this
> is appreciated.
> But, obiouvsly, this is IMHO.
>
> --
> :: Francesco ::
> Jabber: francesco@jabber.org
> E-Mail: francesco@bsod.eu
> GnuPG: FE9DDD5F
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe: =A0alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
>
>



--=20
Jeff


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---